The BDN Opinion section operates independently and does not set newsroom policies or contribute to reporting or editing articles elsewhere in the newspaper or on bangordailynews.com.
Don’t say “Moon race.” Perish the thought! But there is a race to land on the moon, and the Russians are cheating. Well, sort of cheating.
It’s the Indian Space Research Organization, renowned for its ability to do big things on a relatively small budget that has made the running on the current project, a soft landing at the moon’s south pole.
It was India’s lunar orbiter Chandrayaan-1 that first reported the presence of water molecules in the lunar soil in 2008. The deep shadows of the southern polar region, never exposed to full sunlight, seems the best place to look for actual water ice, so Indian Space Research Organization followed up in 2019 with Chandrayaan-2, which made the first lunar landing attempt at the South Pole.
That “mother ship” is still in orbit making observations, but the lander and surface rover it sent down unfortunately crashed when the braking jets shut down a few seconds too early. Chandrayaan-3 is the follow-up, scheduled to send down its lander on the 23rd or 24th of this month.
Now here’s the thing. Indian Space Research Organization chose those dates because they mark the start of the two-week lunar day, to give their lander and the surface rover it carries the maximum amount of time to charge up their batteries in sunlight before the two-week lunar night arrives.
Rocosmos, the Russian space agency, initially chose the same landing date, obviously for the same reason. But when the Russian South Pole mission actually lifted off last week, Russia’s space chief, Yuri Borisov, told state television that it would land on the 21st. “We hope to be first,” he told workers at the Vostochny cosmodrome in the Russian Far East.
It’s physically possible, because the Russian rocket, Luna-25 (named in succession to the last Russian lunar mission in 1976, Luna-24) is a much bigger launcher carrying a lander only half the mass of the Indian one. If the Russians don’t spend time examining the landing site for possible hazards (as the Indians are doing), they could get their lander down first.
If both landers get down safely, however, there is no significant long-term advantage for the Russians in landing first (which is why the Indians are being very grown-up about the Russian gambit.) The Outer Space Treaty, signed in 1967, establishes the rule that no nation can own the Moon.
A subsequent moon agreement, signed in 1979, states more specifically that no nation, organization or private individual can own resources on the moon — but only four countries have signed it, not including the United States, China or Russia.
This is the first time some specific part of the moon has become important for space-faring powers. If the south polar region does have a lot of frozen water, then it is the obvious base for missions going to planetary destinations beyond the Earth-moon system.
Just get yourself a reliable source of electrical power (solar panels or small nuclear reactors), and you can start melting the ice. There’s your drinking water sorted. Then split the water by electrolysis, and it will give you oxygen for breathing and hydrogen for rocket fuel. Add some hydroponics for food, and you’re basically independent for basic necessities.
It depends on just where the water ice is, but there could be serious competition for the best sites around the south pole. The moon race rivals would be China and Russia on one side — they plan to start building their moon base, the International Lunar Research Station, as early as 2026 — and the members of the U.S.-led Artemis Accords on the other.
Artemis includes all the other countries capable of sending anything significant to the moon (the U.S., India, France, Japan, South Korea, Israel and the United Arab Emirates). The U.S. is planning to send a manned mission to the lunar South Pole in 2025, and the game between the International Lunar Research Station and the Artemis Accords group will develop from there.
If there turn out to be many, widely distributed sources of water ice near the pole, it will remain (as both sides insist it is) a friendly competition. If not, then not.
