Letters submitted by BDN readers are verified by BDN Opinion Page staff. Send your letters to [email protected]
It’s clear that Rep. Jared Golden gained some insight about the danger that AR-style rifles present to the public following the Lewiston shooting. But his objection to proposals like background checks and waiting periods because they are “unresponsive to the facts of our local tragedy” is disappointing, to say the least. Does he suggest we wait until another close-to-home tragedy occurs with a different set of circumstances before supporting a comprehensive approach to the gun violence epidemic in the U.S.?
Here’s the problem: elected officials are expected to make decisions on a broad swath of policies — from public health, to energy and infrastructure, to foreign policy, to public safety – for which they have little to no practical experience or knowledge. A good politician will have experience in multiple areas to help guide their decision making. A great politician will recognize their inability to be an expert in every area, and will instead seek out the knowledge and guidance of experts around them who can help guide their decision making.
I’m glad Golden possesses the maturity to allow a new set of experiences to influence his policy positions, a quality many politicians lack. But his constituents would be better served if he heeded the advice of experts in public health when considering his approach on gun violence. We shouldn’t have to wait for additional lives to be lost in Maine before our legislators see the light on proven and effective policies like waiting periods, background checks, and extreme risk protection orders.
Joe Anderson, DO
Founder
Maine Providers for Gun Safety
Portland
